bu10.bib

@comment{{This file has been generated by bib2bib 1.96}}
@comment{{Command line: bib2bib -c '$key="WOODBURY12A" or $key="QIAN2010A" or $key="WOODBURY06F" or $key="MARK2010A" or $key="WOODBURY07K" or $key="WOODBURY07N" or $key="ERHAN2011A" or $key="MARK2011A" or $key="WOODBURY07I" or $key="WOODBURY09A" or $key="WOODBURY04B" or $key="WOODBURY07L" or $key="NASIROVA2011A" or $key="CHANG03" or $key="WOODBURY07J" or $key="Maleki2008A" or $key="WOODBURY05B" or $key="WOODBURY2012C" or $key="DATTA2014A" or $key="WOODBURY2012B" or $key="ERHAN2009A" or 1=2' ./rw.bib}}
@inproceedings{CHANG03,
  address = {Indianapolis},
  author = {Wilson Chang and Robert F. Woodbury},
  booktitle = {ACADIA 2003},
  month = {October},
  pages = {19-27},
  title = {Undo Reinterpreted},
  year = 2003
}
@article{Datta2014A,
  title = {Responsive envelope tessellation and stochastic rotation of 4-fold penttiles },
  journal = {Frontiers of Architectural Research },
  volume = {3},
  number = {2},
  pages = {192 - 198},
  year = {2014},
  note = {},
  issn = {2095-2635},
  doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2014.03.002},
  url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095263514000156},
  author = {Sambit Datta and Stuart Hanafin and Robert F. Woodbury},
  keywords = {Facade tessellation},
  keywords = {Stochastic rotation},
  keywords = {Responsive envelopes},
  keywords = {Moveable facade components},
  keywords = {Parametric modelling },
  abstract = {Abstract This paper reports on the design and control of a responsive envelope based on the rotation of tessellated components. The study investigates responsive and dynamic approaches for building facades and envelopes to regulate solar shading, light control, views and thermal gain within the building. It is well known that near real-time visual output from computational simulation can significantly impact the prediction of dynamic building-environment interactions and lead to the development of smart, adaptable, net zero energy buildings. To address these motivations, this paper reports the development of an experimental simulation of a responsive envelope based on using a 4-fold penttile scheme. The simulation is developed using a novel pentagonal approach involving component (tile) design, tessellation and control methods. The paper further elaborates on the geometry and control aspects of the facade subdivision and presents the results of applying this tessellation geometry to a building envelope shading study based on facade components with rotation. Finally, it tests the “responsiveness” to multiple performance metrics by applying a non-deterministic exploration method for the stochastic rotation of individual panels. The sophisticated evaluation of alternative envelope configurations for a set of performance criteria require a tighter computational coupling between modelling and control of dynamic geometry. }
}
@inproceedings{ERHAN2009A,
  author = {Halil Erhan and Rob Woodbury and Nahal H. Salmasi},
  title = {{V}isual sensitivity analysis of parametric design models:
                   {I}mproving agility in design},
  key = {Erhan},
  booktitle = {Joining Languages, Cultures and Visions: CAADFutures 2009},
  pages = {815-829},
  year = 2009,
  editor = {T. Tidafi and T. Dorta},
  address = {Montreal},
  month = {June},
  organization = {CAADFutures}
}
@article{ERHAN2011A,
  author = {Halil Erhan and Nahal H. Salmasi and Rob Woodbury},
  title = {{ViSA}: {A} {P}arametric {D}esign {M}odeling {M}ethod to
                   {E}nhance {V}isual {S}ensitivity {C}ontrol and {A}nalysis},
  journal = {International Journal of Architectural Computing},
  year = 2011,
  key = {Erhan},
  volume = 8,
  number = 4,
  pages = {461-483}
}
@article{MARK2010A,
  author = {Earl Mark and Robert Woodbury},
  title = {Editorial},
  journal = {International Journal of Architectural Computing},
  year = 2010,
  key = {Mark},
  volume = 8,
  number = 3,
  pages = {iii-iv},
  note = {My name was omitted. This was corrected by errata in the
                   next editorial.}
}
@article{MARK2011A,
  author = {Earl Mark and Robert Woodbury},
  title = {Editorial},
  journal = {International Journal of Architectural Computing},
  year = 2011,
  key = {Mark},
  volume = 9,
  number = 2,
  pages = {iii-iv}
}
@article{Maleki2008A,
  author = {Maryam Maleki and Robert Woodbury},
  title = {Reinterpreting {R}asmi Domes with geometric constraints: a
                   Case of Goal-seeking in Parametric Systems},
  journal = {International Journal of Architectural Computing},
  year = 2008,
  key = {Maleki},
  volume = 6,
  annote = {4 number field in the Bibtex, not used in EoPD},
  pages = {375-395},
  annote = {\relax\par {\bfseries Abstract:}
                   \emph{Geometry has long been a generator of architecture. In
                   traditional Persian architecture, Rasmi domes project a
                   drawing onto a predefined 3D geometry. In fact, the word
                   'rasmi' and the verb for drawing in Persian have the same
                   linguistic root. Projection is readily done in manual
                   drawings or conventional CAD programs. From a constraint
                   perspective, the dome is constrained by the drawing and the
                   3D geometry. If the latter constraint is replaced by
                   invariance of distance on the original drawing, a class of
                   domes results, but members of this class cannot be computed
                   with conventionally. Class members are developable from a
                   planar layout of triangles, which is, in turn, generated by
                   a simple drawing rule. This yields a parametric structure
                   of four parameters. Three determine the initial planar
                   diagram. One determines configuration.  Further, domes in
                   the class are mechanisms: they are not fully specified by
                   the constraints and parameters. We develop the geometric
                   constraints representing the location of the defining
                   points of a dome and present a goal-seeking algorithm to
                   solve the constraints within a propagation-based parametric
                   modeling system.}}
}
@inproceedings{NASIROVA2011A,
  author = {Diliara Nasirova and Andy T. Huang and Halil Erhan and Robert
                   Woodbury and Bernhard E. Riecke},
  title = {Change Detection in 3{D} Parametric Systems: Human-Centered
                   Interfaces for Change Visualization},
  key = {Nasirova},
  booktitle = {CAADFutures 2011},
  pages = {751-764},
  year = 2011,
  month = {July}
}
@article{QIAN2010A,
  author = {Qian, Zhenyu Cheryl and Chen, Yingjie Victor and Woodbury, Robert F.},
  title = {Design Patterns to Support Collaborative Parametric Design},
  journal = {International Journal of Design Sciences and Technology},
  volume = {17},
  number = {1},
  pages = {57-75},
  year = {2010}
}
@article{WOODBURY04B,
  author = {Zhenyu Qian and Robert F. Woodbury},
  journal = {International Journal of Design Computing},
  key = {Qian},
  title = {Between Reading and Authoring: patterns of digital interpretation},
  year = 2004,
  volume = 7,
  note = {Accessed at
                   http://wwwfaculty.arch.usyd.edu.au/kcdc/ijdc/vol07/articles/woodbury/index.html
                   on 28 {F}ebruary 2010}
}
@inproceedings{WOODBURY05B,
  address = {Frauenw{\"{o}}rth Cloister, Germany},
  author = {Robert Aish and Robert Woodbury},
  booktitle = {{S}mart{G}raphics, 5th {I}ntl. {S}ymp., {SG}2005},
  editor = {A. Butz and B. Fisher and A. Kr{\"{u}}ger and P. Oliver},
  key = {Aish},
  month = {August},
  pages = {151-162},
  publisher = {Springer},
  series = {LNCS 3638},
  title = {Multi-level Interaction in Parametric Design},
  keywords = {{--Architecture,} {--CAD,} {--Parametric} Modeling},
  year = 2005
}
@inproceedings{WOODBURY06F,
  address = {Vancouver, Canada},
  author = {Davis Marques and Robert F. Woodbury},
  booktitle = {{S}mart{G}raphics, 6th {I}ntl. {S}ymp., {SG}2006},
  editor = {A. Butz and B. Fisher and A. Kr{\"{u}}ger and P. Oliver},
  key = {Marques},
  month = {24-26 July},
  pages = {230-235},
  publisher = {Springer},
  series = {LNCS 4073},
  title = {Using rule based selection to support change in parametric {CAD} systems},
  year = 2006
}
@inproceedings{WOODBURY07I,
  author = {Davis Marques and Robert Woodbury},
  booktitle = {CAADFutures 2007},
  key = {Marques},
  month = {July},
  pages = {279-288},
  organization = {CAADFutures Foundation},
  title = {Managing Contingency in Parametric Models through Implicit Relational Modeling},
  year = 2007
}
@inproceedings{WOODBURY07J,
  address = {Halifax (Nova Scotia)},
  author = {Robert Woodbury and Axel Kilian and Robert Aish},
  booktitle = {Expanding Bodies: Art {\textbullet} Cities {\textbullet} Environment: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture},
  key = {Woodbury},
  month = {1-7 October},
  pages = {222-229},
  title = {Some Patterns for Parametric Modeling},
  publisher = {Riverside Architectural Press and Tuns Press},
  year = 2007
}
@inproceedings{WOODBURY07K,
  author = {Yingjie (Victor) Chen and Zhenyu (Cheryl) Qian and Robert Woodbury},
  booktitle = {CAADFutures 2007},
  key = {Chen},
  month = {July},
  organization = {CAADFutures Foundation},
  pages = {403-416},
  title = {Local Navigation can Reveal Implicit Relations},
  year = 2007
}
@inproceedings{WOODBURY07L,
  author = {Davis Marques and Robert Woodbury},
  booktitle = {EuropIA 11: 11th International Conference on Design
                   Sciences and Technology},
  key = {Marques},
  month = {September},
  editor = {Giovanni De Paoli and Khaldoun Zreik and Reza Beheshti},
  pages = {305-322},
  title = {Federation Modeling: Interactions in Parametric Design},
  year = 2007
}
@inproceedings{WOODBURY07N,
  address = {Halifax (Nova Scotia)},
  author = {Zhenyu Qian and Yingjie Chen and Robert Woodbury},
  booktitle = {Expanding Bodies: Art {\textbullet} Cities {\textbullet}
                   Environment: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of
                   the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture},
  key = {Qian},
  month = {1-7 October},
  pages = {230-241},
  title = {Participant Observation can Discover Design Patterns in Parametric Modeling},
  publisher = {Riverside Architectural Press and Tuns Press},
  year = 2007
}
@book{WOODBURY09A,
  author = {Robert Woodbury},
  title = {Elements of Parametric Design},
  publisher = {Taylor and Francis},
  year = 2010,
  isbn = {0-415-77986-3},
  key = {Woodbury},
  note = {With contributions from Brady Peters, Onur Y\"uce G\"un and Mehdi Sheikholeslami},
  annote = {{\bfseries Abstract:} \emph{Design is
                   change. Parametric modeling represents change. It is an old
                   idea, indeed one of the very first ideas in computer-aided
                   design. In his 1963 PhD thesis, Ivan Sutherland was right
                   in putting parametric change at the centre of the Sketchpad
                   system. His invention of a representation that could adapt
                   to changing context both created and foresaw one of the
                   chief features of the computer aided design (CAD) systems
                   to come. The devices of the day prevented Sutherland from
                   fully expressing what he might well have seen, that
                   parametric representations could deeply change design work
                   itself. I believe that, today, the key to both using and
                   making these systems lies in another, older idea. People do
                   design. Planning and implementing change in the world
                   around u one of the key things that make us
                   human. Language is what we say; design and making is what
                   we do. Computers are simply a new medium for this ancient
                   enterprise. True, they are the first truly active
                   medium. They are general symbol processors, almost
                   limitless in the kind of tool that they can present. With
                   much craft and care, we can program them to do much of what
                   we call design. But not all. Designers continue to amaze us
                   in with new function and form. Sometimes new work embodies
                   wisdom, a precious commodity in a finite world. To the
                   human enterprise of design, parametric systems bring fresh
                   and needed new capabilities in adapting to context and
                   contingency and exploring the possibilities inherent in an
                   idea. What is the new knowledge and skill designers need to
                   master the parametric? How can we learn and use it?  That
                   is what this book is about. It aims to help designers
                   realize the potential of the parameter in their work. It
                   does so by combining basic ideas of parametric systems
                   themselves with equally basic ideas from both geometry and
                   computer programming.}}
}
@book{WOODBURY12A,
  author = {Robert Woodbury},
  title = {Elements of Parametric Design},
  publisher = {Taylor and Francis},
  year = 2010,
  key = {Woodbury},
  note = {With contributions from Brady Peters, Onur Y\"uce G\"un and
                   Mehdi Sheikholeslami. Forthcoming Chinese translation}
}
@incollection{WOODBURY2012B,
  author = {Robert Woodbury},
  title = {Foreword},
  booktitle = {\emph{Wassim Jabi,} Parametric Design in Architecture},
  key = {Woodbury},
  publisher = {Laurence King Publishing},
  year = 2012
}
@incollection{WOODBURY2012C,
  author = {Robert Woodbury},
  booktitle = {Inside Smartgeometry},
  editor = {Brady Peters and Terri Peters},
  title = {Design Flow and Tool Flux},
  publisher = {John Wiley \& Sons},
  year = 2013,
  key = {Woodbury},
  pages = {102-111},
  abstract = {Tools exist to improve work. They embody mostly simple and
                   often singular ideas: a wrench is a lever arm with the
                   centre of a bolt as its fulcrum; a knife is a sharp edge
                   with a safe handle; an arc-welder channels electrical
                   current through a point of contact.  People refine tools,
                   typically by holding the central idea constant and making
                   it work better in a specific context. Thus wrenches become
                   socket sets; we have knives just for sushi and tig welders
                   enable extremely fine work in specialty metals. A tool's
                   central seed idea remains constant and the number of seed
                   ideas is much smaller than the number of tools available.
                   Computer tools are no different--they embody a few good
                   ideas. Here I argue for seven central ideas that form the
                   flux towards better design design media: dataflow
                   programming; ubiquitous scripting; the web of abstraction;
                   symbol amplifiers; the web of mathematics;
                   human-in-the-loop data import and export; and the loop of
                   bits to atoms and atoms to bits.  I conclude with and
                   argument for the explicit representation of alternatives,
                   idea that is becoming important but has not yet matured in
                   design media.},
  isbn = {978-1-118-52246-2}
}

This file was generated by bibtex2html 1.96.